No animus, Snark. Why would there be? Is that
Post# of 22453
Is that what we're all doing here? Saying nothing until "there's evidence to support?" If you insist on beating that drum, please list for everyone all of the evidence that Squires is simply doing his best to avoid violating SEC rules. Or is it that he's prohibited from disclosing facts to shareholders by NDAs? I cant remember which excuse Puravida thought was "supported by evidence" this time. Maybe because theres too much evidence supporting them. With all of those facts, I'm sure you'll have a long list itemizing evidence for us to read.
By the way, there isn't a lack of evidence problem. Theres plenty of that. There's a concealment of evidence problem. I can assure you, concealment itself is evidence.
And yes, being a lawyer, I have a pretty good idea how law firms work. But if that bothers you, do what Puravida does and cite the "internet's veil of anonymity" to support the idea that your speculation about how law firms work is of equal weight to my actual experience. That seems like a great way to come to the most honest, well-supported, rational conclusion possible.