When it was a just cause for dismissal and not par
Post# of 148282
(Total Views: 539)
Posted On: 08/18/2021 8:30:00 PM
Re: craigakess #100660
When it was a just cause for dismissal and not part of his lawsuit against Cytodyn. How much more evidence needs to be provided? Dr.Pestell would of filed unlawful dismissal if Cytodyn didn’t have cause to fire him. He filed for not being paid what was due him in some gray language. One that went to court and Cytodyn had to pay what was judged to be proper compensation.
Doesn’t mean that Cytodyn received any value from this employee. That Pestell didn’t screw the shareholders out of his promise of a cancer test that eventually had no value. Delayed the trial because he probably new he needed all paperwork completed for his deal of his company being purchased by Tony C and Cytodyn who pushed the deal to the BOD and played Cytodyn for millions that we will never recoup. Dr Pestell and Tony C were asked to leave Cytodyn for screwing shareholders out of millions of dollars. Nader jumped in and tried to save the shareholders some additional written compensation that wasn’t clear on compensation to Pestell.
This was not Naders Fault as the 13d group would have us believe. He jumped in to try to save the stockholders monies. Monies that were later judged in favor of Dr. Pestell because there was no fault cause or performance clause written into the contract for the cancer test. In other words… we were stuck paying million for a test that never worked and Dr. Pestell is probably the only one that knew that it didn’t work. Yet Tony C should of had a performance clause written in to protect the shareholders. Lack of leadership showed through and the best reason possible to dismiss him.
Yet these people believe they can take over and guide us better. Fat chance! They are pond scum in the spring when all the toads are laying their ugly eggs. The eggs of the 13d group that are toxic at best… I despise this group if you can’t tell… I don’t want to take a chance on a losers group of arrogant people that have put themselves first over everyone else. They should just go away!!!
Doesn’t mean that Cytodyn received any value from this employee. That Pestell didn’t screw the shareholders out of his promise of a cancer test that eventually had no value. Delayed the trial because he probably new he needed all paperwork completed for his deal of his company being purchased by Tony C and Cytodyn who pushed the deal to the BOD and played Cytodyn for millions that we will never recoup. Dr Pestell and Tony C were asked to leave Cytodyn for screwing shareholders out of millions of dollars. Nader jumped in and tried to save the shareholders some additional written compensation that wasn’t clear on compensation to Pestell.
This was not Naders Fault as the 13d group would have us believe. He jumped in to try to save the stockholders monies. Monies that were later judged in favor of Dr. Pestell because there was no fault cause or performance clause written into the contract for the cancer test. In other words… we were stuck paying million for a test that never worked and Dr. Pestell is probably the only one that knew that it didn’t work. Yet Tony C should of had a performance clause written in to protect the shareholders. Lack of leadership showed through and the best reason possible to dismiss him.
Yet these people believe they can take over and guide us better. Fat chance! They are pond scum in the spring when all the toads are laying their ugly eggs. The eggs of the 13d group that are toxic at best… I despise this group if you can’t tell… I don’t want to take a chance on a losers group of arrogant people that have put themselves first over everyone else. They should just go away!!!
(21)
(0)CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼