patterson cydy stock ownership - laughable stra
Post# of 155308
(Total Views: 728)
Posted On: 08/12/2021 4:45:48 PM
patterson cydy stock ownership -
laughable strategery
"f. Dr. Patterson’s responses to questions C1, C2 and C3 are inconsistent. In
response to question C2, Dr. Patterson states that 596,242 [sic] shares of
the Company’s stock are beneficially held by IncellDx, and Dr. Patterson,
in turn, owns 17.92% of IncellDx (which would mean that Dr. Patterson
only owns a portion of the 596,242 [sic] shares). On the other hand, the
responses to question C1 and C3 state that Dr. Patterson beneficially owns
all 569,242 shares and that all such shares are held directly in his name.
Response: We note that your Letter incorrectly refers to Dr. Patterson as
beneficially owning 596,242 shares of the Company’s common stock in two
places and 569,242 shares in one place. As stated in his questionnaire, Dr.
Patterson is the beneficial owner of 569,242 shares of common stock of the
Company. Dr. Patterson has requested that the company re-register these
shares in the name of IncellDx. To Dr. Patterson’s knowledge, this has not
been done, and the shares remain registered in Dr. Patterson’s name. Due to
the above, Dr. Patterson disclaims beneficial ownership of 569,242 shares of
CYDY common stock, as set forth in his response to question C2."
what kind of slippery transaction is this? according to 13D response - patterson requests the 569,242 sharesof CYDY that he personally owns to be transferred to incelldx, most likely to infer that he doesnt "really" have beneficial ownership of cydy?...was he "just holding it for a friend?"...the back and forth of what is claimed to be incelldx activity and what is personal patterson activity is mesmerizing...anyone buying this? no.
laughable strategery
"f. Dr. Patterson’s responses to questions C1, C2 and C3 are inconsistent. In
response to question C2, Dr. Patterson states that 596,242 [sic] shares of
the Company’s stock are beneficially held by IncellDx, and Dr. Patterson,
in turn, owns 17.92% of IncellDx (which would mean that Dr. Patterson
only owns a portion of the 596,242 [sic] shares). On the other hand, the
responses to question C1 and C3 state that Dr. Patterson beneficially owns
all 569,242 shares and that all such shares are held directly in his name.
Response: We note that your Letter incorrectly refers to Dr. Patterson as
beneficially owning 596,242 shares of the Company’s common stock in two
places and 569,242 shares in one place. As stated in his questionnaire, Dr.
Patterson is the beneficial owner of 569,242 shares of common stock of the
Company. Dr. Patterson has requested that the company re-register these
shares in the name of IncellDx. To Dr. Patterson’s knowledge, this has not
been done, and the shares remain registered in Dr. Patterson’s name. Due to
the above, Dr. Patterson disclaims beneficial ownership of 569,242 shares of
CYDY common stock, as set forth in his response to question C2."
what kind of slippery transaction is this? according to 13D response - patterson requests the 569,242 sharesof CYDY that he personally owns to be transferred to incelldx, most likely to infer that he doesnt "really" have beneficial ownership of cydy?...was he "just holding it for a friend?"...the back and forth of what is claimed to be incelldx activity and what is personal patterson activity is mesmerizing...anyone buying this? no.
(8)
(0)