Lepine v. Rosenbaum Case No. 19-cv-12577 https://
Post# of 155594
(Total Views: 583)
Posted On: 07/29/2021 12:57:46 PM
Lepine v. Rosenbaum Case No. 19-cv-12577
https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=1...d=22228832
ROSENBAUM EMAIL SNIPPET REGARDING HIS DEBT TO MS. LEPINE:
WOW!!!!
I detect some anger
I knew the only reason you called me before your trip to New Orleans was to get a check. In fact the last three times you called was really not to say hello. I will send you a check soon.
True Rentrak is at 64 but I can assure you I sold out at a much lower price.
COMMENT ABOUT ABOVE
Above is a snippet from the link supplied by Normy. To me, the deflection of the full repayment of a lone speak volumes of ones way of thinking. Previously said he would pay only when one of his stock investments reach $40 per share as if that is something the loan should be tide to. Then defensive about said investment going well above $40. Layer upon layer of excuses? I could be wrong, but could this be an indication of a person's character here, in the public domain for all to judge for themselves?
I do not see how anyone would risk thier reputation by through a Rosenbaum association, even if he is totally at fault. This is classic reputational risk. Makes no difference true or false ... the reputation risk through association is extremely high in my opinion.
"Reputational Risk" is a real thing. Every medium to large firm actually considers this very seriously every day. Again, does not matter if it is true or not, the risk now exists. Check for yourself, all firms that are "not small" do analysis this today.
https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=1...d=22228832
ROSENBAUM EMAIL SNIPPET REGARDING HIS DEBT TO MS. LEPINE:
WOW!!!!
I detect some anger
I knew the only reason you called me before your trip to New Orleans was to get a check. In fact the last three times you called was really not to say hello. I will send you a check soon.
True Rentrak is at 64 but I can assure you I sold out at a much lower price.
COMMENT ABOUT ABOVE
Above is a snippet from the link supplied by Normy. To me, the deflection of the full repayment of a lone speak volumes of ones way of thinking. Previously said he would pay only when one of his stock investments reach $40 per share as if that is something the loan should be tide to. Then defensive about said investment going well above $40. Layer upon layer of excuses? I could be wrong, but could this be an indication of a person's character here, in the public domain for all to judge for themselves?
I do not see how anyone would risk thier reputation by through a Rosenbaum association, even if he is totally at fault. This is classic reputational risk. Makes no difference true or false ... the reputation risk through association is extremely high in my opinion.
"Reputational Risk" is a real thing. Every medium to large firm actually considers this very seriously every day. Again, does not matter if it is true or not, the risk now exists. Check for yourself, all firms that are "not small" do analysis this today.
(9)
(0)