Got a direct message from 5%. I had suggested the
Post# of 148151
Quote:
Maybe you should consider really looking at the potential new management can bring, instead of drawing unfounded conclusions about a an activist effort?
I wrote him back. What I wrote is not news to you all, but here it is:
Quote:
I have really looked at the previous "work" of two of your group's members at the helm of CYDY, at the past record of several members at your group in bringing down other companies, at the attempt of one prominent member of your group to evade a longstanding debt, and at the connection of at least one of the members in your group with Big Pharma. My conclusion is that two aims are likely: 1) that the new group (as stated) will purchase Incell, likely for an inflated price and 2) that the new group will soon sell off the company for a depressed price that does not reflect the vast possibilities of the drug.
Meanwhile, no real plan has been advanced to the small fish like myself, but real arrogance has been brandished in its stead on this board.
It would be helpful if you were more transparent, and told ush ow many of you own how much of Incell. You boast about shares of CYDY held. How much Incell? At what price do you plan to buy it? My conjecture is that this sale is the way you've convinced Patterson to join the cabal.
Past history is an indication of future action. Lying and ruination of shareholder value have indeed been part of the past history of some of your group.
P.S. For your info, RTB is a far more useful tool than you have been. I believe you've alienated many shareholders.