At the moment, I’m more interested in present pe
Post# of 22465
(Total Views: 447)
Posted On: 07/09/2021 2:42:33 PM
At the moment, I’m more interested in present performance than promises about how some activity about which we have only limited information might somehow benefit the company in the future. And, to be sure, the present performance in which I’m interested is tangible. It’s the preparation and filing of reports, followed by the registration of the company so that the stocks I bought, which were registered when I bought them, have value, which, given the company’s loss of registration, they presently don’t, notwithstanding your assurances that good things are happening behind the curtain that are creating enormous value which is not presently reflected in the stock price but one day will be.
Remember, we were talking about how many tests were being sold and what QTMM’s share of the revenues would be when we should have been paying attention to something else. I know, I know, I know. Who could have known this sucker punch was in the offing? A person would have had to received a letter from the SEC telling them their registration would be revoked if these materials weren’t filed by a specific date, right? And then, after receiving that letter, the CEO would have had to file a bunch of other documents with the SEC full of information that would make the share price quadruple or quintuple, and describing a lot of activity the CEO was tending to other than preparation and filing of the SEC documents, test still not prepare or file their late reports. And the CEO would have to omit ever disclosing to the shareholders that the SEC had sent this letter communicating informing the company about their future de-registration if the company did not comply, while shareholders who were invested long bought more shares in the belief that the circumstances described in these published documents presented an opportunity for enormous gains that were worth the known risks (though they weren’t worth the risks concealed from the shareholders by the CEO at the same time he was releasing all the other information).
And we thought carole18 was crazy because he/she was forecasting doom for reasons completely unrelated to development and deployment of company’s product.
So, the question is, when the company’s faces enormous setbacks by failures unrelated to the development and deployment of the company’s product, are the ones talking about the company’s product really so smart? Or are they just looking in the wrong place, like suckers at a carnival distracted by the curvaceous assistant in the shiny outfit?
What you don’t know can hurt you, but not as much as the things you’re sure of that just ain’t so. There’s a competence and honestly problem at QTMM that has nothing to do with the promise held by its technology. It’s a bad idea to see them as “either/or” propositions, telling others to focus on one and ignore the other. Especially after we’ve been bitten so hard by the former. And so recently.
Remember, we were talking about how many tests were being sold and what QTMM’s share of the revenues would be when we should have been paying attention to something else. I know, I know, I know. Who could have known this sucker punch was in the offing? A person would have had to received a letter from the SEC telling them their registration would be revoked if these materials weren’t filed by a specific date, right? And then, after receiving that letter, the CEO would have had to file a bunch of other documents with the SEC full of information that would make the share price quadruple or quintuple, and describing a lot of activity the CEO was tending to other than preparation and filing of the SEC documents, test still not prepare or file their late reports. And the CEO would have to omit ever disclosing to the shareholders that the SEC had sent this letter communicating informing the company about their future de-registration if the company did not comply, while shareholders who were invested long bought more shares in the belief that the circumstances described in these published documents presented an opportunity for enormous gains that were worth the known risks (though they weren’t worth the risks concealed from the shareholders by the CEO at the same time he was releasing all the other information).
And we thought carole18 was crazy because he/she was forecasting doom for reasons completely unrelated to development and deployment of company’s product.
So, the question is, when the company’s faces enormous setbacks by failures unrelated to the development and deployment of the company’s product, are the ones talking about the company’s product really so smart? Or are they just looking in the wrong place, like suckers at a carnival distracted by the curvaceous assistant in the shiny outfit?
What you don’t know can hurt you, but not as much as the things you’re sure of that just ain’t so. There’s a competence and honestly problem at QTMM that has nothing to do with the promise held by its technology. It’s a bad idea to see them as “either/or” propositions, telling others to focus on one and ignore the other. Especially after we’ve been bitten so hard by the former. And so recently.
(0)
(0)