I never said anything about criticism of management being an issue with moderators. However, changing critical endpoints in the middle of the endless tiny trials that have been ongoing for years is something we loudly criticize in others, namely HCQ and Remdisivir, yet a miniscule increase in good outcomes is touted like we've had an actual successful trial outcome. I think it's actually not a very good look for a moderator to use ad-hominem to defend his or her actions. Johnny Six Posts is not the "C" word, but it would fall towards the bottom of the argument validity pyramid.