UNVC4ever, I could give you both. I cannot give y
Post# of 4861
(Total Views: 642)
Posted On: 06/28/2021 4:29:17 PM
UNVC4ever, I could give you both. I cannot give you any good reason for why Dalton might max out the share count (and after all, he could always go even higher). I have been told Dalton also issued himself over a billion more shares which he can dump or keep depending on his mood at the time.
If the shares are used to buy other companies, then that could be a very good thing for UNVC shareholders. We currently have no reason to believe he is doing this, and he is not telling us anything at all.
I asked if the float remained the same as is reported on OTC. I was told that it was not likely to be the same since the authorized shares is now so much higher.
My hope is that Dalton is selling shares to rich individual investors. If so, then he is attempting to meet the minimum requirement for listed shareholders. This would mean he is attempting to up list. But then one must ask why is there so much selling?
If you listened closely to the IFAH presentation, it was stated that wealthy investors were present. So why didn't they gobble up shares? Perhaps because the presentation Dalton gave did not say when he will do what he states. Lots of names provided, but nothing to indicate when investors might benefit. And, Dalton spent a lot of time talking about charities and non-profits, so how does that help shareholders?
Some say we are waiting for a name change. So if Dalton does change the name, then why couldn't he also change the date for the annual report? I suggest that he could, and that would give him another six months at least to become current. Perhaps he could even get an extension.
I wish I knew what Dalton's plans were, but I don't. I currently do not even know what I own.
If the shares are used to buy other companies, then that could be a very good thing for UNVC shareholders. We currently have no reason to believe he is doing this, and he is not telling us anything at all.
I asked if the float remained the same as is reported on OTC. I was told that it was not likely to be the same since the authorized shares is now so much higher.
My hope is that Dalton is selling shares to rich individual investors. If so, then he is attempting to meet the minimum requirement for listed shareholders. This would mean he is attempting to up list. But then one must ask why is there so much selling?
If you listened closely to the IFAH presentation, it was stated that wealthy investors were present. So why didn't they gobble up shares? Perhaps because the presentation Dalton gave did not say when he will do what he states. Lots of names provided, but nothing to indicate when investors might benefit. And, Dalton spent a lot of time talking about charities and non-profits, so how does that help shareholders?
Some say we are waiting for a name change. So if Dalton does change the name, then why couldn't he also change the date for the annual report? I suggest that he could, and that would give him another six months at least to become current. Perhaps he could even get an extension.
I wish I knew what Dalton's plans were, but I don't. I currently do not even know what I own.
(6)
(2)