Per JFM Justfactsmam Member Level Saturday,
Post# of 72447
(Total Views: 636)
Posted On: 06/12/2021 10:49:47 AM
Per JFM
Justfactsmam Member Level Saturday, 06/12/21 10:24:14 AM
Re: loanranger post# 362259 0
Post #
362271
of 362271
Let's be clear... PAYING FOR A "Service" (Testing) provided by an INDEPENDENT REGIONAL BIOCONTAINMENT LABORATORY ("RBL"
...
...does not make the results of the Service (Test) ... "NOT INDEPENDENT"
To make that assumption, one MUST ASSUME SOME BIZZARE set of fact and IGNORE OTHERS:
1. RBL's are corrupt and not independent...i.e a Biotech firm can "buy" (bribe the entity) the results it is looking for.
2. The mission statement of the RBL's is, IN FACT, TO SERVE (in Part) private sector Biotech firms in testing their compounds at their request and pay for said service.
3. Additionally RBL seeks and is given GRANTS from Governmental Agencies to investigate, test, and analyze compounds and test them against bacteria and viruses (specific to the interest of the Grantor.
Therefore...IPIX utilizing the GMU RBL to do another "test"...( WHILE GMU WAS ALREADY INDEPENDENTLY (ie not paid by IPIX) INVESTIGATING BRILACIDIN ...a service for which IPIX likely saved considerable $ and only paid just over $30K (since GMU researcher was deep into Brilacidin at the time).
Payment for Service and conclusions provided by an Independent Government Agency...remains Independent research.
Grant funding an investigation of Brilacidin by RBL, which Grants are received independent of IPIX, remain Independent research.
If the basic premise is Payment of a Service authorized and mandated to be provided by a Government Scientific Agency is never independent if the Service is required to be paid for ...then ALL TESTING PAID FOR BY ANY BIOTECH IS NEVER INDEPENDENT...
ALL clinical trials Paid for by Private Companies and the ancillary services (CRO's, Hospital Sites, Medical Staff supported by those payments) would in some have to be DEEMED...Not Independent Research...
The only conclusion left...NO RESEARCH SUBSIDIZED, PAID FOR, or SUPPORTED BY A BIOTECH COMPANY IS INDEPENDENT...
Beyond an absurd conclusion!!!
Justfactsmam Member Level Saturday, 06/12/21 10:24:14 AM
Re: loanranger post# 362259 0
Post #
362271
of 362271
Let's be clear... PAYING FOR A "Service" (Testing) provided by an INDEPENDENT REGIONAL BIOCONTAINMENT LABORATORY ("RBL"
... ...does not make the results of the Service (Test) ... "NOT INDEPENDENT"
To make that assumption, one MUST ASSUME SOME BIZZARE set of fact and IGNORE OTHERS:
1. RBL's are corrupt and not independent...i.e a Biotech firm can "buy" (bribe the entity) the results it is looking for.
2. The mission statement of the RBL's is, IN FACT, TO SERVE (in Part) private sector Biotech firms in testing their compounds at their request and pay for said service.
3. Additionally RBL seeks and is given GRANTS from Governmental Agencies to investigate, test, and analyze compounds and test them against bacteria and viruses (specific to the interest of the Grantor.
Therefore...IPIX utilizing the GMU RBL to do another "test"...( WHILE GMU WAS ALREADY INDEPENDENTLY (ie not paid by IPIX) INVESTIGATING BRILACIDIN ...a service for which IPIX likely saved considerable $ and only paid just over $30K (since GMU researcher was deep into Brilacidin at the time).
Payment for Service and conclusions provided by an Independent Government Agency...remains Independent research.
Grant funding an investigation of Brilacidin by RBL, which Grants are received independent of IPIX, remain Independent research.
If the basic premise is Payment of a Service authorized and mandated to be provided by a Government Scientific Agency is never independent if the Service is required to be paid for ...then ALL TESTING PAID FOR BY ANY BIOTECH IS NEVER INDEPENDENT...
ALL clinical trials Paid for by Private Companies and the ancillary services (CRO's, Hospital Sites, Medical Staff supported by those payments) would in some have to be DEEMED...Not Independent Research...
The only conclusion left...NO RESEARCH SUBSIDIZED, PAID FOR, or SUPPORTED BY A BIOTECH COMPANY IS INDEPENDENT...
Beyond an absurd conclusion!!!
(3)
(0)