No, he said 5-6 times the "highest ever" balance.
Post# of 154910
(Total Views: 530)
Posted On: 06/09/2021 12:28:47 PM
Re: Goosebumps #93213
No, he said 5-6 times the "highest ever" balance. How is that helping your argument?
I don't need to be "under suspicion." I have always been transparent about my position. It is currently mid to high five digits. It used to be double that. I have fully de-risked and taken enough profit. I have bought more shares recently. All this has been posted previously (not that I expect anyone to track it).
I was responding to a post that said, we "don't need additional investment." It is my belief that is completely inaccurate. So, I posted that we probably will report about $30 million in cash on hand at May 31. This is both an "all-time high" for a public filing, and "not enough" to remove the need for additional investment.
Please read and digest some facts, accept that this is not a riskless investment, accept some opposing opinions and allow balanced dialogue.
It feels like you are trying to intimidate me from posting. You are hurting my feelings.
I don't need to be "under suspicion." I have always been transparent about my position. It is currently mid to high five digits. It used to be double that. I have fully de-risked and taken enough profit. I have bought more shares recently. All this has been posted previously (not that I expect anyone to track it).
I was responding to a post that said, we "don't need additional investment." It is my belief that is completely inaccurate. So, I posted that we probably will report about $30 million in cash on hand at May 31. This is both an "all-time high" for a public filing, and "not enough" to remove the need for additional investment.
Please read and digest some facts, accept that this is not a riskless investment, accept some opposing opinions and allow balanced dialogue.
It feels like you are trying to intimidate me from posting. You are hurting my feelings.
(9)
(1)