Puravida I appreciate your contributions to this b
Post# of 22454
However, I will not be eating crow. What you do not "correlate" is that you just made an assumption about my statement that isn't true. I never said Squires isn't greatly responsible for how far this company has come. I was just pointing out that he is greatly responsible, if not solely responsible for the company's delinquency. Both can be true. If QTMM remains delinquent nothing else will matter for shareholders.
I do have faith that they will get up to date. But in my view, no matter how talented Squires may be (or may not be), if you miss deadline after deadline and can't keep the public company that you run up to date on filings, you have no business being CEO. His talents would be best utilized elsewhere in the company. I really can't believe that anyone at this point would think otherwise.