What I'm really curious about, is how WR managed t
Post# of 1507
for the reverse split, the replacement of the former CEO, and the subsequent huuuge capital infusion
which ( - my calculation-) resulted in a 99,9% stake in GESI .
And all this with a " cashless" deal !!
In all the jurisdictions I know of, such a transaction would have required a qualified majority voting of the shareholders of both companies involved.
Also, a detailed upfront information and an extraordinary shareholders meeting would have been mandatory.
What was the proceeding here ? Was everything in accordance with the law ?