Actually, I may take a different approach than yo

Actually, I may take a different approach than you might on the success or failure of a CEO. . Over a year ago the CEO of Cytodyn decided to make a major strategic move which was to shift the company towards treating an immediate need , being Covid, thus moving some cash and focus away from Cancer and HIV. That strategy is in process with initial battles being lost (the US except for LH'ers). So the battleground has shifted to international . If Cytodyn is successful enough in any country right now or with LH'ers and the company grows in revenue and is on a path towards profitability because of it, he will be successful. Conversely, if Cytodyn is perpetually 2 steps behind the virus and countries lose their focus on the ICUs because they are less and less being occupied by Covid victims, and Long Haulers finds other avenues to health, his plan will have failed.
Abraham Lincoln would have lost elections if he ran in 1862 or 1863. He went thru generals like crazy because many weren't very strong and a war which was supposed to be over after the first battle of Manasses lasted 4 years. The Union army was losing, but he made tactical decisions to the overall strategy of winning the war starting with bringing the right military leadership and the rest is history.
So my point is, let the strategy play out. We are at a key point here and im not overjoyed about this management team losing focus right now with them looking inward fighting for their jobs over a 5% interest in the stock. this type of distraction could actually have a worse impact than people imagine.