Thanks to Ohm for being the voice of reason in thi
Post# of 155378
(Total Views: 579)
Posted On: 05/26/2021 12:37:27 AM
Thanks to Ohm for being the voice of reason in this journey of turmoil that Cytodyn is on with this attempted overthrow of the management and Board of Directors by the moronic 5%er’s. Who I believe has motives beyond just concerned investors. Who is really pushing this attempt? Who has the most to gain from this turmoil? This is far to organized an attempt to not come from really big money and where does the really big money come from?
Ohm your reply to Blafarm’s post was right on. Ever notice how Blafarm has everyone who might comment on ignore and nobody that would comment on one of his posts can attach his post to it? Why is so many on ignore? Is he afraid of criticism? What are his credentials to even criticize the trial protocols? Is Blafarm a MD? Trial designer? The primary end points are new and I believe achievable. Have we not already achieved them before?
The only thing in question to me is dose on the moderate trial. It’s something we haven’t heard of at 350mg dosage for the following 3 dosages after a 700mg dose on the moderate trial. I can wait until the next opportunity to question this comes about in a web call or some other explanation of why the smaller dose. I am sure there is a logical reason. I have no credentials to make any judgement at all but I will listen closely to the science behind it when the information is made public.
For those that try to pass judgement before hand. Consider their credentials and their motives of why? Until you find out why from the science of the trial design we are all clueless. Science will always dictate and I can wait for the science to be revealed. Until it is revealed... believe very little of the complaining. Let the real science prevail when we find out why. Let’s pay attention to those that would steer us on a path of destruction.
Ohm your reply to Blafarm’s post was right on. Ever notice how Blafarm has everyone who might comment on ignore and nobody that would comment on one of his posts can attach his post to it? Why is so many on ignore? Is he afraid of criticism? What are his credentials to even criticize the trial protocols? Is Blafarm a MD? Trial designer? The primary end points are new and I believe achievable. Have we not already achieved them before?
The only thing in question to me is dose on the moderate trial. It’s something we haven’t heard of at 350mg dosage for the following 3 dosages after a 700mg dose on the moderate trial. I can wait until the next opportunity to question this comes about in a web call or some other explanation of why the smaller dose. I am sure there is a logical reason. I have no credentials to make any judgement at all but I will listen closely to the science behind it when the information is made public.
For those that try to pass judgement before hand. Consider their credentials and their motives of why? Until you find out why from the science of the trial design we are all clueless. Science will always dictate and I can wait for the science to be revealed. Until it is revealed... believe very little of the complaining. Let the real science prevail when we find out why. Let’s pay attention to those that would steer us on a path of destruction.
(9)
(2)