Hylander, what has been "worked out" about the ini
Post# of 36536
Actually, GMIN makes a good point: if there were no NUGX, then there would be no need for two classes of shares, because those shares likely would remain restricted. Moreover, the stated method of conversion of Class A to Class B, barring some bizarre set of circumstances, will effectively result in a reverse split of those Class A shares when they convert to Class B shares. Even though I did not have a cost basis for those shares, there remains the inescapable fact that the issuance of those shares had, is having, and will have an impact on the value of our GNBT shares as well. So yeah, I care about who started NUGX, especially if someone who is not management can do this to a company. I would think that the folks who actually control the company, and have a fiduciary obligation to their shareholders, likewise would not only want to know, but actually would find out, and then advise the shareholders accordingly, in order to reassure them that their investment is not being ignored.