I am not protecting the FDA. I only hope to protec
Post# of 154852
(Total Views: 524)
Posted On: 05/23/2021 5:14:11 PM
I am not protecting the FDA. I only hope to protect our investment is all. My motives only are to the success of Cytodyn. My thoughts were that we may of caused the response that the FDA did with their letter. I can’t say the investors did cause it but it can be construed that way. It’s my interpretation of why the letter was written to slow the attack of the investors. It makes sense but can’t confirm it.
When you have what could be well over a thousand and maybe 10,000 investors writing the FDA and or politicians you don’t know what your going to get. Everybody will write something different and many will not be tactful in the words they choose. Could be downright derogatory with cussing and name calling. Those letters will represent us all as investors. May do more harm than good. Not the wisest response in my opinion.
My interpretation of the events are in the best interest of our investment and nothing more. I have watched the rudeness on the chat boards and can only imagine how nasty some of the letters have been. I personally believe that would be wrong to be nasty to a group of regulators we need to get approvals from in the future. It just doesn’t make sense and using common sense knowing we should not is all I have tried to make known. At this point all I can say is if anyone still has the need to complain directly to the FDA in the future. To be respectful and smart on how you word your letter to not further the alienation of the FDA any further. That is my biggest concern for the future of our company. It would of been better to have one person write a letter and for everyone to sign that letter in support than to have 10,000 what could be nasty letters.
My perception is for the good of the company. I am well aware of the people on not just this board writing some terrible stuff and rallying other to write the FDA and let them have it... so to speak. Explain to me how even 1,000 terribly written letters can help us? Tell me how that would be in the best interest of the company?
When you have what could be well over a thousand and maybe 10,000 investors writing the FDA and or politicians you don’t know what your going to get. Everybody will write something different and many will not be tactful in the words they choose. Could be downright derogatory with cussing and name calling. Those letters will represent us all as investors. May do more harm than good. Not the wisest response in my opinion.
My interpretation of the events are in the best interest of our investment and nothing more. I have watched the rudeness on the chat boards and can only imagine how nasty some of the letters have been. I personally believe that would be wrong to be nasty to a group of regulators we need to get approvals from in the future. It just doesn’t make sense and using common sense knowing we should not is all I have tried to make known. At this point all I can say is if anyone still has the need to complain directly to the FDA in the future. To be respectful and smart on how you word your letter to not further the alienation of the FDA any further. That is my biggest concern for the future of our company. It would of been better to have one person write a letter and for everyone to sign that letter in support than to have 10,000 what could be nasty letters.
My perception is for the good of the company. I am well aware of the people on not just this board writing some terrible stuff and rallying other to write the FDA and let them have it... so to speak. Explain to me how even 1,000 terribly written letters can help us? Tell me how that would be in the best interest of the company?
(7)
(0)