Its disappointing you didn't give any weight to th

Quote:

---

Its disappointing you didn't give any weight to the positives but just dwelt in the negatives.

---

I focused on the negatives because we are in a situation that is negative, with a Federal Agency (SEC) that tends to commit to one resolution, and one only, which is revocation. I have told others here recently about my positivity with regards to our outcome, and others have provided positives, such as yourself, as well. But after reading through the numerous revocation orders and seeing Quantum in a similar situation with regards to it's suspension, doubt has started to creep in. I have been cautiously optimistic since the start of my investment in 2017, and eagerly optimistic when the Pasaca deal came through. But the fact of the matter, is that OTC companies 9 out of 10 times do not come back after a suspension.

In contrast, it is good that you provided the positives within you're post, as an equal assessment should be made, and the points you made are good points. Perhaps it's impatience on my part, or the idea that years of investment and opportunity is at risk, or a drop in my personal investor confidence, I don't know. But this is what this board is for; to talk about QMC, our opinions and research on it.

Quote:

---

So if it turns our you are wrong and QMC continues trading, I will take your word when you tell me you printed out your post and ""will more than happy eat my words and say that I was wrong".

---

I have no issues stating when I am wrong, and will happily admit that when the time comes.

My posts is of my opinion only. Please conduct your own Due Diligence; this is YOUR investment.