It really depends on the approach If UNVC inten
Post# of 4861
(Total Views: 345)
Posted On: 05/15/2021 1:20:32 PM
It really depends on the approach
If UNVC intends to go 'pink current' the first thing that would be seen is the name change on FINRA.
If UNVC is going for a Direct Listing via a 'new' entity the first thing we would see is an S-1, once ratified by all involved parties.
As for a traditional uplist, we do not currently meet the criteria, and dark companies do not qualify for uplist anyway, they would have to get current first.
Pink Current:
• FINRA name change
• 2 years audited accounts, attorney letter
• OTC profile verification
• Transfer Agent appointed
• Pink Current
Upper Exchange:
• Meet uplist criteria
• Apply for NASDAQ
• S-1 Registration Statement
As I have said many times, a regular 8K won't cut it.
If UNVC intends to go 'pink current' the first thing that would be seen is the name change on FINRA.
If UNVC is going for a Direct Listing via a 'new' entity the first thing we would see is an S-1, once ratified by all involved parties.
As for a traditional uplist, we do not currently meet the criteria, and dark companies do not qualify for uplist anyway, they would have to get current first.
Pink Current:
• FINRA name change
• 2 years audited accounts, attorney letter
• OTC profile verification
• Transfer Agent appointed
• Pink Current
Upper Exchange:
• Meet uplist criteria
• Apply for NASDAQ
• S-1 Registration Statement
As I have said many times, a regular 8K won't cut it.
(4)
(1)Scroll down for more posts ▼