Not at all. It's valid to point out all views. I

Not at all. It's valid to point out all views. I"ve done so in the past and been criticized for it here. But SOME are always negative, or they try to subtly criticize by always and only expressing "concerns". Just as some are always positive. Open minded is fine, but agenda driven is not open minded.

I could be mistaken, but my simple logic (mine only certainly) suggests that someone who believes in IPIX enough to invest their hard earned cash would post more positively in general. They BELIEVE and they stay "engaged" with what they believe in. The flip side of that coin, such as never (or rarely) posting positively (i.e. only raising "concerns" raises the question of WHY someone is therefore "engaged". I don't "engage" in things that I don't believe in. No interest in doing such FOR ME and it seems like a waste of my time. Behavior such as engaging in a forum about a stock that one seemed to have no positive view of simply makes no sense TO ME. ANOTHER poster is certainly free to do so, but what MOTIVATES them to do so does seem like a logical question.

INTERESTING that you didn't bother to answer my question. WHY NOT?