Back to Goosebumps and the several others who resp

Back to Goosebumps and the several others who responded to my angry post last night......

Closet has explained my thinking pretty well. When NP made the statement about "Option 1," he immediately said, "Is this acceptable by regulatory agencies? I’m not sure,..."

It is ludicrous for our CEO to tell us about Option 1 and then admit that he doesn't know if this is an acceptable plan to regulatory agencies.

I have been expecting the medical and statistical people on this site to tell Goosebumps and the board that adding on new patients in a non-randomized way and then mixing it with the old data is not going to give you statistically valid information. But, for some reason, they haven't said that. TechGuru is one person I thought would have chimed in on that issue.

That is why my angry post said this: "I think it is complete fantasy and not actually happening, but it doesn't seem that anyone (a) agrees with me, or (b) agrees with you. Is this really happening??"

And, Goose, of course I'm invested and have been for almost 5 years. I have posted many times about my history and remaining position (50% of the original position).