I know what type of permit they have, just like Bu
Post# of 7795
(Total Views: 352)
Posted On: 03/28/2021 8:55:27 AM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #6307
I know what type of permit they have, just like Buc. He was posting the truth about what the permit allowed while Kyle is certifying SEC filings calling it a Recovery Permit.
The company is the one having issues, not me. I even posted they had the SEC filings wrong BEFORE they made correction.
The permit requires notification of the discovery BEFORE recovery. Everything they do MUST BE APPROVED ahead of time. They said they found multiple artifacts in December, and they did what the permit requires, which is notification of the Bureau.
And after all these years why are they “puzzled” by what is allowed? The permit is so restrictive finding a 300 year old wreck that would likely be buried is hard enough, but the company admits in the reports Melbourne is highly scattered.
The legislature gave the BAR the authority, but the BAR enacts their own policies. The folks at BAR have through policy essentially put an end to the commercial salvage industry unless you were grandfathered in, like Juno Beach. Any word on the variance?
Even if they get it, good luck getting a Recovery Permit. They’ll find some reason to deny it or make it soooooo restrictive it would make it impossible to recover anything for the museum.
So years ago you claimed SFRX was the bridge, and in that time a Recovery Permit expired and 5 1/2 years ago they asked for it to be renewed with no success. Yet you mock others that say there is no bridge. Looks like that bridge claim was bogus.
BTW, I didn’t ask why SFRX wasn’t Microsoft yet. You claimed 8 years ago it was on the verge of becoming the Microsoft/Apple of the industry.
I asked you if they had obtained that lofty height you said then they would soon reach. Why or why not?
The company is the one having issues, not me. I even posted they had the SEC filings wrong BEFORE they made correction.
The permit requires notification of the discovery BEFORE recovery. Everything they do MUST BE APPROVED ahead of time. They said they found multiple artifacts in December, and they did what the permit requires, which is notification of the Bureau.
And after all these years why are they “puzzled” by what is allowed? The permit is so restrictive finding a 300 year old wreck that would likely be buried is hard enough, but the company admits in the reports Melbourne is highly scattered.
The legislature gave the BAR the authority, but the BAR enacts their own policies. The folks at BAR have through policy essentially put an end to the commercial salvage industry unless you were grandfathered in, like Juno Beach. Any word on the variance?
Even if they get it, good luck getting a Recovery Permit. They’ll find some reason to deny it or make it soooooo restrictive it would make it impossible to recover anything for the museum.
So years ago you claimed SFRX was the bridge, and in that time a Recovery Permit expired and 5 1/2 years ago they asked for it to be renewed with no success. Yet you mock others that say there is no bridge. Looks like that bridge claim was bogus.
BTW, I didn’t ask why SFRX wasn’t Microsoft yet. You claimed 8 years ago it was on the verge of becoming the Microsoft/Apple of the industry.
I asked you if they had obtained that lofty height you said then they would soon reach. Why or why not?
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼