Here is the problem I have with selling vs holding
Post# of 148059
Nader should not have applied for an EUA unless he was confident that it would be approved.
Or, is this a more accurate statement?
Nader WOULD NOT have applied for an EUA unless he was confident that if would be approved. (He did say he was "discussing" an EUA with the FDA)
A rejection of our EUA application, would be a grand disaster IMO, considering the present state of affairs of SP, trials, approvals, revenues, financial status, debt, etc.
And what's with this new thing where FDA employees can't buy CYDY stock?
calstang wrote:
$2.31 per share?
EUA on the table?
31.8% reduction in critical deaths 65 and younger vs SOC?
HIV and all the other indications?
Global unmet urgent need for a therapeutic for critical cv19 folks dying daily?
Variant/mutations causing increasing concerns for the future and more lockdowns?
Buyers should be gobbling this stock up.....
craigakess wrote:
Yes, the were successful with their HIV trials, but the BLA has been an unmitigated disaster.If an EUA is issued, people will be happy to catch this stock on its way up, because that really is the safest play right now. I always thought of CYDY as a lottery ticket, and that is more true now than it ever has been.
SAF wrote:
Why do you think they aren't gobbling it up?
my response?
SP where it is, it's obvious that some longs have sold. Short attacks have been devastating. Waiting has been beyond painful with perpetual concerns about shorts, manipulation and corruption. Recent drastic share price drop now look at craigakess comments above, I agree with him as to why folks aren't buying.
Should folks be buying?