i havent seen the nnlx emails yet and just looked
Post# of 9142

a link to the Dec 2 Pr is in the board info but there it leads to nothing on the PR site now=perhaps the result of the low priced PR NNLX opted for but:
the ff is a link to the Dec 2 PR
https://www.einpresswire.com/article/53188821...7bfCcu0GcI
I surmise the Dec 2 provides the background necessary to put this into context
the info in the recent email is presumably and in context new- the result of testing since Dec 2
and as mits points out such testing would have to be done by a NNLX partner with biolevel 3 lab is what i think mits said

