Why cry over spilt milk? Why assign blame. Will it
Post# of 153886
(Total Views: 411)
Posted On: 03/08/2021 1:02:34 PM
Why cry over spilt milk? Why assign blame. Will it do any good? I don’t think so. Do we need to hammer someone or some company for mistakes? I don’t think so. We have writing campaign going on to Ms. Woodcock. Will that help. Maybe? If it does and she holds true to her previous beliefs we might get that EUA soon and our next trial will be conformational only as we are used across the nation for critical. Just a dream that has very small legs. We can only hope she changes her mind.
Going foreword for this next trial I think we should approach Nader and get a voice from this IH board on the trial design so we could blame ourselves if something goes wrong on the next trial. We all need to take ownership of our actions. I don’t believe really that we need a board member from IH to help with design no matter who it is. If we don’t get the next trial EUA. Which isn’t likely... as we will soon achieve an EUA from the next 140 person trial. Time will serve us properly this next time. Seeking people or companies to blame just sounds like 20/20 hindsight we all wish we had as our foresight. The results are what the results are and hope is hope. But the next trial is a slam dunk. We or at least I can live with it either way. Short trial... short time to wait. We really do have a bright future knowing the next primary endpoint is locked up as a slam dunk. Worrying about what I like to call the small shit in life just isn’t worth it. If you believe we have the next primary endpoint locked up because we have already achieved it once. Then why worry so much? It will just cause health problems for worry and stress. We got this people. One way or the other and the only thing separating it is “time”. We should all have a couple months of time to wait if needed. We have waited this long. You know your not exiting like that short this morning with his exit speech. That was a joke... got a good chuckle out of that.
Going foreword for this next trial I think we should approach Nader and get a voice from this IH board on the trial design so we could blame ourselves if something goes wrong on the next trial. We all need to take ownership of our actions. I don’t believe really that we need a board member from IH to help with design no matter who it is. If we don’t get the next trial EUA. Which isn’t likely... as we will soon achieve an EUA from the next 140 person trial. Time will serve us properly this next time. Seeking people or companies to blame just sounds like 20/20 hindsight we all wish we had as our foresight. The results are what the results are and hope is hope. But the next trial is a slam dunk. We or at least I can live with it either way. Short trial... short time to wait. We really do have a bright future knowing the next primary endpoint is locked up as a slam dunk. Worrying about what I like to call the small shit in life just isn’t worth it. If you believe we have the next primary endpoint locked up because we have already achieved it once. Then why worry so much? It will just cause health problems for worry and stress. We got this people. One way or the other and the only thing separating it is “time”. We should all have a couple months of time to wait if needed. We have waited this long. You know your not exiting like that short this morning with his exit speech. That was a joke... got a good chuckle out of that.
(3)
(1)