Can you add more color to the "seems to be hype ar

Can you add more color to the "seems to be hype around the data"? (as in who or where is the data being hyped?)

So far I've only been reading various message boards(which is not necessarily the best temperature taker) but overall it seems that missing the PE, and cherry picking only a few highlights to share has most people on edge or at least wanting more data. I'd personally like to see some data on the severe (and submitted such a question for the CC). Since we trended toward showing significance in Moderate in the M/M trial, and severe should be less worse(grammar?) than critical, I'd like to know how we did. Did they recover faster? Did we keep more from going to critical vs placebo? Inquiring minds would like to know. I realize the PR contained only the highlights management wanted to convey, I was just hoping for more. I guess more is coming in the form of a publication(per the PR), but those things seem to take forever, unless its not a peer reviewed pub.