That's not what I'm suggesting --- he already told
Post# of 82672
you they are still a vendor ..... so if that's the case
why aren't they mentioning SafeVchat & Privacylok?
They are only pushing Endpointlock ....
so it really doesn't seem like they are still a vendor to me.
I thought his response was a bit too abrupt and
open to some questioning. As far as the revenue
still owed to SFOR --- you make it sound like it's
ACS's fault ..... why isn't it also SFOR's fault?