I agree with you. I think he's either doing one of

I agree with you. I think he's either doing one of two things. The first, and most probable, in my opinion, is that he's flipping this stock. He is negative on the stock when he's trying to drive the price down to buy back in after pumping the positive points and then selling. Or, as he attempts to say, he's "fair and balanced" in his approach and likes to present both sides equally, or something to that effect. The problem with this 2nd approach is that in order to support the varying false and debunked claims of negativity, he would have to agree with the obvious lies, which doesn't speak well to his intelligence. Not a single shred of negative posters have proven to be factual or truthful and I'm pretty certain they ALL know it. On the other hand, the science and 'anecdotal' evidence, of which there is plenty, all confirms that the drug works safely and effectively. So, how can he possibly be fair and balanced in his approach AND still remain intelligent? I just don't buy it. I seem him purely as manipulative toward his own needs.