Yeah alot of OTC stocks running up rediculous....m
Post# of 11040
(Total Views: 461)
Posted On: 02/26/2021 12:37:59 PM
Yeah alot of OTC stocks running up rediculous....margin calls on debt volume per broker account? Need cash/liquidy bc rules are enforced now.
Don't know about daily price action predictions but I certainly believe much higher prices are probable given the circumstances now.
Thanks for the heads up on SCIE. Did you notice TSNP (now TSNPD) will trade under a new name HMBL is performed a cusip and name change recently...
I will reference these posts on the other site to save time...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=162169565
onehundredmph Friday, 02/26/21 11:03:37 AM
Re: DiscoveryStock post# 48653 0
Post #
48655
of 48659
I saw another stock recently just changed its name and cusip...but it had a CEO ...who decided to do a reverse split in addition to address its share structure imbalance. The stock is up now. It ran from .0001 to almost $2 before Finra slapped the D on the ticker and started the name change, cusip change, and share structure process. And now instead of the price going down which is customary....the price continues to rise. Go figure...
Do you think a custodian could do a reverse split with CRGP? Wouldn't there need to be a CEO and proxy for shareholders to vote on assuming the Article of Incorporation includes it? Ohh and wouldn't CRGP need to be reinstated in a State first? Currently, its Nevada registration is revoked.
https://esos.nv.gov/EntitySearch/BusinessInformation
I don't think a reverse split will occur on this stock because there is no current CEO and what previous litigation (relating to the dividend) has provided details on record that a share structure imbalance does exist in CRGP.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=160441757
onehundredmph Friday, 02/26/21 12:15:59 PM
Re: misiu143 post# 48656 0
Post #
48657
of 48659
That is a good point too... there is a significant difference in share structure between the two. But I do not believe an RM will take place unless absolutely necessary. Plus the share structure may be in question between the TA and SSM at this point...Does the AS even matter at this point since the company is revoked? The OS is the only thing that matters? And Why is SSM not updating anything on Twitter? At least announce the new custodianship...lol. At this point, everyone who is interested in CRGP knows already anyway. Guess I just have to be more patient. I believe we are golden here.
Ohh did you notice the price action in the 30 days it took T**P to run before Finra acted on instructions from that company? WOWZA!!!
and noticed all SSM plays today have low volume...
----
misiu143 Member Level Friday, 02/26/21 11:55:55 AM
Re: onehundredmph post# 48655 0
Post #
48656
of 48659
I believe you are talking about TSNP ,
In TSNP there was close to 5 B OS , in CRGP about 900 Mil I believe.
This is a big difference , and hopefully we will have reverse merger without RS.
IMO.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=162172629
$CRGP
Don't know about daily price action predictions but I certainly believe much higher prices are probable given the circumstances now.
Thanks for the heads up on SCIE. Did you notice TSNP (now TSNPD) will trade under a new name HMBL is performed a cusip and name change recently...
I will reference these posts on the other site to save time...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=162169565
onehundredmph Friday, 02/26/21 11:03:37 AM
Re: DiscoveryStock post# 48653 0
Post #
48655
of 48659
I saw another stock recently just changed its name and cusip...but it had a CEO ...who decided to do a reverse split in addition to address its share structure imbalance. The stock is up now. It ran from .0001 to almost $2 before Finra slapped the D on the ticker and started the name change, cusip change, and share structure process. And now instead of the price going down which is customary....the price continues to rise. Go figure...
Do you think a custodian could do a reverse split with CRGP? Wouldn't there need to be a CEO and proxy for shareholders to vote on assuming the Article of Incorporation includes it? Ohh and wouldn't CRGP need to be reinstated in a State first? Currently, its Nevada registration is revoked.
https://esos.nv.gov/EntitySearch/BusinessInformation
I don't think a reverse split will occur on this stock because there is no current CEO and what previous litigation (relating to the dividend) has provided details on record that a share structure imbalance does exist in CRGP.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=160441757
onehundredmph Friday, 02/26/21 12:15:59 PM
Re: misiu143 post# 48656 0
Post #
48657
of 48659
That is a good point too... there is a significant difference in share structure between the two. But I do not believe an RM will take place unless absolutely necessary. Plus the share structure may be in question between the TA and SSM at this point...Does the AS even matter at this point since the company is revoked? The OS is the only thing that matters? And Why is SSM not updating anything on Twitter? At least announce the new custodianship...lol. At this point, everyone who is interested in CRGP knows already anyway. Guess I just have to be more patient. I believe we are golden here.
Ohh did you notice the price action in the 30 days it took T**P to run before Finra acted on instructions from that company? WOWZA!!!
and noticed all SSM plays today have low volume...
----
misiu143 Member Level Friday, 02/26/21 11:55:55 AM
Re: onehundredmph post# 48655 0
Post #
48656
of 48659
I believe you are talking about TSNP ,
In TSNP there was close to 5 B OS , in CRGP about 900 Mil I believe.
This is a big difference , and hopefully we will have reverse merger without RS.
IMO.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=162172629
$CRGP
(0)
(0)Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
U.S. Constitution
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Quote:
If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/