Thought about adding a thing this morning on this subject, but I can’t provide a link.
“...it sounds like many long haulers did have mild symptoms.”
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=606...z6nX8YM5Cz
It may be true that mild symptoms lead to Long-Hauler syndrome. I think that if you are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, that you have LESS antibodies - that link I can’t provide.
I have assumed that mild early symptoms equate to less chance of suffering long haulers syndrome. But I’m not sure.
The fork in the road for me is if you have less viral load as a mildly symptomatic patient, and also less antibodies as a result of being a mildly symptomatic patient, do you have a lesser or greater chance of getting long haulers. I “think” you have less antibodies. Which wins? The stick? Or the carrot?
But as always, I don’t know nuthin’.
Chazzle
“...it sounds like many long haulers did have mild symptoms.”
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=606...z6nX8YM5Cz
It may be true that mild symptoms lead to Long-Hauler syndrome. I think that if you are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, that you have LESS antibodies - that link I can’t provide.
I have assumed that mild early symptoms equate to less chance of suffering long haulers syndrome. But I’m not sure.
The fork in the road for me is if you have less viral load as a mildly symptomatic patient, and also less antibodies as a result of being a mildly symptomatic patient, do you have a lesser or greater chance of getting long haulers. I “think” you have less antibodies. Which wins? The stick? Or the carrot?
But as always, I don’t know nuthin’.
Chazzle
