So it binds very well to control HIV but if anothe

So it binds very well to control HIV but if another disease is present Leronlimab apparently becomes gunshy and can't get it up enough to block the receptor properly any longer?

Baloney.

In fact, I declare shenanigans.

This reminds me of the "Food Babe" who made a name for herself looking up scary sounding ingredients in food and then used them to scare people who don't understand anything about the ingredient, which generally was either found naturally in the body or in such microscopically low numbers as to have been deemed safe by the FDA. BUT SCARY WORDS!

The one that comes to mind is that apparently Subway bread has the same ingredient as yoga mats. Oh no! Every time you're eating bread from Subway you're basically eating a yoga mat! Everyone knows you don't eat yoga mats. No, yoga mats are meant to be rolled up and left in a corner of a room in case you start dating a girl and want her to think you're a sensitive fellow.

It's nitpicking numbers to try to spin things negatively. We've been told by our scientists that Leronlimab binds exceedingly well to CCR5 and crosses the blood brain barrier with . Either it blocks it or it doesn't. Leronlimab might not end up effective against certain disease for other reasons, but not because it can't bind effectively to CCR5 unless HIV is nearby.