So what are you trying to to say? Point I was maki
Post# of 155600
(Total Views: 506)
Posted On: 02/16/2021 8:41:42 PM
So what are you trying to to say? Point I was making was the trial would start before March like your source said it was delayed to that time for starting.
I posted a video of the CEO stating that it would start and finish enrollment in February. Just because this information hasn’t been released doesn’t mean that it hasn’t happened. You come back a couple days later and support my premise with a video from Dr Gaylis stating it will start very soon. That video was possibly dated February 5th by another post on the board and supporting what I have said about what Nader has said because Nader should know more than you and I or anyone for that matter. Yet you can’t admit that the possibility that Nader might know more than your source? I will still have to go with Nader over your source and note that when shown probable evidence by a CEO it doesn’t matter to you. That you will not take what the CEO over someone that might of heard a hearsay prediction that’s not a day or two different but weeks different. You try and try to prove a point that to me holds no water and then say... naner naner naner... there hasn’t been a release of said trial starting yet as your final argument. Are you for real?
It might of been easier to just watch the January 26th video and know that February will most likely start and fill the trial in just days. Previous CC or videos by Nader stating that the trial will fill in a week or less has been stated a few times once the trial starts. Your new source Dr Gaylis supports a February start and a quick enrollment is expected.
Now if you want to believe still that the trial will still start next month and try to support that argument with Dr Gaylis comments. I don’t know why you even brought that foreword because it doesn’t support your March trial start. I am a little confused on your ability to keep things straight and maybe you don’t know it but there could be a brain fog happening and you might want to see if your eligible for the Long Hauler trial... now that’s funny huh? lol...
I posted a video of the CEO stating that it would start and finish enrollment in February. Just because this information hasn’t been released doesn’t mean that it hasn’t happened. You come back a couple days later and support my premise with a video from Dr Gaylis stating it will start very soon. That video was possibly dated February 5th by another post on the board and supporting what I have said about what Nader has said because Nader should know more than you and I or anyone for that matter. Yet you can’t admit that the possibility that Nader might know more than your source? I will still have to go with Nader over your source and note that when shown probable evidence by a CEO it doesn’t matter to you. That you will not take what the CEO over someone that might of heard a hearsay prediction that’s not a day or two different but weeks different. You try and try to prove a point that to me holds no water and then say... naner naner naner... there hasn’t been a release of said trial starting yet as your final argument. Are you for real?
It might of been easier to just watch the January 26th video and know that February will most likely start and fill the trial in just days. Previous CC or videos by Nader stating that the trial will fill in a week or less has been stated a few times once the trial starts. Your new source Dr Gaylis supports a February start and a quick enrollment is expected.
Now if you want to believe still that the trial will still start next month and try to support that argument with Dr Gaylis comments. I don’t know why you even brought that foreword because it doesn’t support your March trial start. I am a little confused on your ability to keep things straight and maybe you don’t know it but there could be a brain fog happening and you might want to see if your eligible for the Long Hauler trial... now that’s funny huh? lol...
(3)
(1)