That is the weakest of arguments. If it's sufficie
Post# of 123761
(Total Views: 134)
Posted On: 02/13/2021 11:46:10 AM
That is the weakest of arguments. If it's sufficient to elicit an objection in a court of law.....calls for speculation…..then why should it be given credence to block an assault weapons ban that existed, that did have positive results and which did NOT impact the ownership of hand guns and hunting rifles , much less result in confiscation.
Still got 'em, right?
8 years of Clinton, 8 years of Obama....NRA loved it. More guns and ammo sold than when the GOP is in charge.
You righties have a really shitty record when it comes to predictions coming true. The last 3 months are illustrative of that FACT.
And, surprise, you are misinformed and misinforming about what Feinstein said about, yes, assault rifles ONLY.
NRA's Chris Cox falsely says Dianne Feinstein wanted to take 'all of your guns'
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/oc...ein-wante/
Cox is off target, because he said Feinstein said she wanted to take away all guns. In reality, back in 1995, Feinstein said she wanted to take away all assault rifles.
That’s a huge difference. While firm numbers are lacking, assault weapons represent a fraction of the country’s estimated total of 310 million guns.
We reached out to the National Rifle Association and did not hear back, but Cox was repeating a charge that has been leveled against Feinstein before. In the past, it tracked back to an interview she did in 1995.
What Feinstein said
Feinstein was a driving force behind the 1994 federal assault weapons ban. It prohibited the manufacture of 19 specific kinds of military-style, semi-automatic firearms, often called assault weapons.
Those restrictions did not apply to any semi-automatic weapons made before the ban’s effective date Sept. 13, 1994. (Congress allowed the ban to expire in 2004.)
In a Feb. 5, 1995 segment on CBS News’ 60 Minutes, correspondent Lesley Stahl explored the surge in sales that preceded the ban. Stahl cited government estimates that as many 1.5 million weapons were in circulation due to the exception carved out in the law.
Stahl said Feinstein told him in an interview that she didn’t want that, but had done the best that should could.
"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,’ I would have done it," Feinstein told Stahl. "I could not do that. The votes weren’t here."
Feinstein repeated that message in a speech on the Senate floor a few months later: "If I had my way, I would ban the possession of assault weapons anywhere in the United States of America, but there were not going to be the votes for that. This is a moderate law."
Her words have always applied to assault weapons, not all firearms. In a 2012 op-ed, she wrote "Let me be clear: If an individual wants to purchase a weapon for hunting or self-defense, I support that right."
And in proposing to ban bump stocks, Feinstein said her bill "does not take anyone's gun." She also said she remains committed to some form of a ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.
Both the total number of firearms and assault-style weapons in the country remain unclear.
According to a Congressional Research Service report, in 2009, the country had about 310 million firearms: "114 million handguns, 110 million rifles, and 86 million shotguns."
In 2013, pro-Second Amendment rights attorney David Hardy said in Senate testimony that nearly 9 million people went target shooting with an AR-15-style weapon. (AR-15 refers to one of the more common styles of the banned weapons.) Hardy used figures from the National Shooting Sports Foundation that showed in 2012 that only about a quarter of shooters owned an AR-style weapon.
Based on that, 9 million would be a high-end estimate of the number of assault weapons owned in 2012. Set against a total number of firearms in excess of 300 million, assault weapons are not a large share of all guns.
Our ruling
Cox said that Feinstein had once said "if she had 51 votes in the Senate for 'Mr. and Ms. America , turn in all of your guns,' they would do it."
This is an inaccurate characterization of what Feinstein said in a 1995 interview on assault-type weapons. It is clear in context about loopholes in the 1994 assault weapon ban that Feinstein would have liked the ban to apply to all assault weapons but did not have the votes.
That is a far cry from banning all firearms, and Feinstein has said she supports the right of people to own a weapon for hunting or self-defense.
We rate this claim False.
Still got 'em, right?
8 years of Clinton, 8 years of Obama....NRA loved it. More guns and ammo sold than when the GOP is in charge.
You righties have a really shitty record when it comes to predictions coming true. The last 3 months are illustrative of that FACT.
Quote:
Even if that is true today it doesn't mean it will be true tomorrow.
And, surprise, you are misinformed and misinforming about what Feinstein said about, yes, assault rifles ONLY.
NRA's Chris Cox falsely says Dianne Feinstein wanted to take 'all of your guns'
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/oc...ein-wante/
Cox is off target, because he said Feinstein said she wanted to take away all guns. In reality, back in 1995, Feinstein said she wanted to take away all assault rifles.
That’s a huge difference. While firm numbers are lacking, assault weapons represent a fraction of the country’s estimated total of 310 million guns.
We reached out to the National Rifle Association and did not hear back, but Cox was repeating a charge that has been leveled against Feinstein before. In the past, it tracked back to an interview she did in 1995.
What Feinstein said
Feinstein was a driving force behind the 1994 federal assault weapons ban. It prohibited the manufacture of 19 specific kinds of military-style, semi-automatic firearms, often called assault weapons.
Those restrictions did not apply to any semi-automatic weapons made before the ban’s effective date Sept. 13, 1994. (Congress allowed the ban to expire in 2004.)
In a Feb. 5, 1995 segment on CBS News’ 60 Minutes, correspondent Lesley Stahl explored the surge in sales that preceded the ban. Stahl cited government estimates that as many 1.5 million weapons were in circulation due to the exception carved out in the law.
Stahl said Feinstein told him in an interview that she didn’t want that, but had done the best that should could.
"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,’ I would have done it," Feinstein told Stahl. "I could not do that. The votes weren’t here."
Feinstein repeated that message in a speech on the Senate floor a few months later: "If I had my way, I would ban the possession of assault weapons anywhere in the United States of America, but there were not going to be the votes for that. This is a moderate law."
Her words have always applied to assault weapons, not all firearms. In a 2012 op-ed, she wrote "Let me be clear: If an individual wants to purchase a weapon for hunting or self-defense, I support that right."
And in proposing to ban bump stocks, Feinstein said her bill "does not take anyone's gun." She also said she remains committed to some form of a ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.
Both the total number of firearms and assault-style weapons in the country remain unclear.
According to a Congressional Research Service report, in 2009, the country had about 310 million firearms: "114 million handguns, 110 million rifles, and 86 million shotguns."
In 2013, pro-Second Amendment rights attorney David Hardy said in Senate testimony that nearly 9 million people went target shooting with an AR-15-style weapon. (AR-15 refers to one of the more common styles of the banned weapons.) Hardy used figures from the National Shooting Sports Foundation that showed in 2012 that only about a quarter of shooters owned an AR-style weapon.
Based on that, 9 million would be a high-end estimate of the number of assault weapons owned in 2012. Set against a total number of firearms in excess of 300 million, assault weapons are not a large share of all guns.
Our ruling
Cox said that Feinstein had once said "if she had 51 votes in the Senate for 'Mr. and Ms. America , turn in all of your guns,' they would do it."
This is an inaccurate characterization of what Feinstein said in a 1995 interview on assault-type weapons. It is clear in context about loopholes in the 1994 assault weapon ban that Feinstein would have liked the ban to apply to all assault weapons but did not have the votes.
That is a far cry from banning all firearms, and Feinstein has said she supports the right of people to own a weapon for hunting or self-defense.
We rate this claim False.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼