But what you refuse to acknowledge is that talking

But what you refuse to acknowledge is that talking about damage from hunting riffles has nothing to do with the ability to rapidly and accurately deliver those very lightweight tumbling upon entry assault rifle rounds on far more people than could a hunting rifle.

Why do you insist on ignoring that fact AND the fact that hunting rifles are not the weapon of choice for the mass murdering nutters who seem to prefer assault rifles?

They must read the same stuff I've been posting.