NP historically has done a cc once a month. If he

NP historically has done a cc once a month. If he stays true to that schedule he will do one next week. The issue is when he veers off script and it’s usually the last sentence or two on a particular subject. Fortunately, he has been qualifying his comments with phrases such as “ for what we know today” vs flatout commit dates. I also think additions of the CSO and the CMO are getting him to temper his enthusiasm a bit when presenting dates. I think also we can assume that not all progress creates a PR. For example , the BLa is a rolling BLA with the non clinical part already completed for HIV. I would assume that’s already been filed but it’s not worthy of a PR. The clinical data is going to be filed “ by q2” per NP so you may see when it has been filed completely, then a PR..