cDiddy wrote: Lower than you'd expect? This appea
Post# of 148288
(Total Views: 496)
Posted On: 01/24/2021 7:13:28 PM
cDiddy wrote:
Lower than you'd expect? This appears to me to be right in line with what we've been seeing. If our placebo group is at 35%, the. The LL arm (assuming 87 deaths) would need to be 15.5%. EIND sans Montefiore was 15%.
My response:
The above yields a reduction in death rate of about 57%, much higher than we need. If released s/c trial data, reveals LL death rate anywhere near our old eIND LL death rate (15%) the data and p value will be outstanding. Note that improved SOC can decrease death rate in both placebo and in LL groups.
Regarding 42 says, I thought that was only a proposed change applying only to the optional Interim analysis at 75% enrollment, which Nader refused in anticipation or rapid enrollment filling up to 100% at 390.
Lower than you'd expect? This appears to me to be right in line with what we've been seeing. If our placebo group is at 35%, the. The LL arm (assuming 87 deaths) would need to be 15.5%. EIND sans Montefiore was 15%.
My response:
The above yields a reduction in death rate of about 57%, much higher than we need. If released s/c trial data, reveals LL death rate anywhere near our old eIND LL death rate (15%) the data and p value will be outstanding. Note that improved SOC can decrease death rate in both placebo and in LL groups.
Regarding 42 says, I thought that was only a proposed change applying only to the optional Interim analysis at 75% enrollment, which Nader refused in anticipation or rapid enrollment filling up to 100% at 390.
(3)
(0)CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼