Calstang, I think we are both correct. The thi
Post# of 147872
(Total Views: 507)
Posted On: 01/08/2021 10:34:56 AM
Calstang,
I think we are both correct. The thing is I am assuming a larger number (range) for VX deaths. In a nutshell: a number of deaths lower than 50 in our cohort will produce a good p-value.
I am not using our reported eIND percentage which is extraordinarily low. If we had, say ,16.9% deaths (44) in our side the p-value would be 0.00048 (yes, 3 zeroes) with a post-hoc power of 94.2%.
GLTU
I think we are both correct. The thing is I am assuming a larger number (range) for VX deaths. In a nutshell: a number of deaths lower than 50 in our cohort will produce a good p-value.
I am not using our reported eIND percentage which is extraordinarily low. If we had, say ,16.9% deaths (44) in our side the p-value would be 0.00048 (yes, 3 zeroes) with a post-hoc power of 94.2%.
GLTU
(3)
(0)CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼