False equivalence. Which IS arguing for the sake o
Post# of 123736
(Total Views: 107)
Posted On: 12/11/2020 10:40:43 AM
False equivalence. Which IS arguing for the sake of arguing, and doing it badly.
Clinton did not pursue or encourage law suits after she lost, with much thinner margins of defeat than Trump suffered in 2 of 3 swing states.
Clinton did not pursue or encourage law suits after she lost, with much thinner margins of defeat than Trump suffered in 2 of 3 swing states.
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼