Let me put it this way? you are looking at a certa
Post# of 123734
I wanted Trump in office as I wanted change from the typical do very little Presidents (both parties) screw that some of our Presidents couldn't get crap done because they were blocked by the other party. Trump moved a few mountains that others would not deal with and probably got lucky as I cringed and the thought of war. I figured Trump would shut his mouth by the end of his first year in office, HE DID NOT!! His mouth costed him more than the virus referencing re-election...he isn't likeable and won't change.
Without arguing political parties it seem democrats have anger deep enough for Trump that they will throw typical people who don't see things their way to the lions and watch them die. This is wrong and when Trump acts and shows his a$$ like the democrats the democrats get in raged like as if they are the only people that can act like that. The democrats showtime acts are one sided which is wrong and heaven forbid if you disagree with them.
I am a person that believes a person must learn from their mistakes and stupidity and my eyes and heart see the democrats and Trump always wanting the last word while many of the republicans are dodging the bullets flying.
A President's personal life should not come into play once he is president.
Let me explain. This hooker deal with Trump. If she was paid she got her money. If Trump raped he will be dealt with by showing proof in a court of law. Take Brett Kavanaugh, under all the circumstances even woman the petitioner said weren't at that house party or didn't actually talk with her. Proof is proof and that is law. Democrats tried to destroy him without proof. Was the lady raped or damn sure in her head that she was? Of course!
At any rate let's say the Supreme Court actually hears the case involving the possible 62 votes. I doubt that the court will even take it up. At any rate let say the rules cross over and screw the constitutional law. The Judges could vote either way just because that is why we have 9 Judges.
It will end up NAY if this is taken up and voted on. Even being right in a case as such they may just allow a tiny bit or feeling in and NAY all this.
So would it be right to allow human feelings into the confirming hearings or proof to make a decision referencing "Kavanaugh"? We should never shadow truth but we do as human have feelings that over power principles.
* In the end did the porn star accept money? I really don't recall? I think she did and if so she traded/gave away her rights with the money contract between them regardless of any rape.