Could you explain how any of the concerns are nega
Post# of 85484
(Total Views: 415)
Posted On: 12/07/2020 3:32:40 PM
Could you explain how any of the concerns are negated just because it existed prior?
I went back to all the LinkedIn posts even the ones that match up to twitter posts. The problem is there is no date and time on the LinkedIn posts so its impossible to know which was posted first.
Here's why it matters: Under the assumption the twitter account is his (which i can verify enough to be comfortable with):
1. Real Doc (twitter) can post something.
2. LinkedIn Doc (not sure if real) can just copy the post from the twitter.
If the LinkedIn post happens first, twitter doc copying it leads to credibility of the LinkedIn account.
I'm trying to find proof that the LinkedIn account is his. This can only strengthen the DD here.
I went back to all the LinkedIn posts even the ones that match up to twitter posts. The problem is there is no date and time on the LinkedIn posts so its impossible to know which was posted first.
Here's why it matters: Under the assumption the twitter account is his (which i can verify enough to be comfortable with):
1. Real Doc (twitter) can post something.
2. LinkedIn Doc (not sure if real) can just copy the post from the twitter.
If the LinkedIn post happens first, twitter doc copying it leads to credibility of the LinkedIn account.
I'm trying to find proof that the LinkedIn account is his. This can only strengthen the DD here.
(1)
(4)Univec Conglomerate Inc (UNVC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼