I think it is unusual to post an article about a foreign approval process that does not even mention CytoDyn. What is slightly weird about it is the fact that this article came out on December 2 and the CC PR came out on December 3. Probably pure coincidence. However, why did CytoDyn post the Philippines' article today, unless the story had some relevance to the company? The CytoDyn website is not a news aggregator. The articles posted there up to this point have a pretty straightforward connection to CytoDyn. What I think we all are doing is attempting to read something into it, which has sometimes caused us disappointment in the past. However, I just don't believe that CytoDyn would be dumb enough to post an article like this unless it had some relevance or connection to CytoDyn. Also, at the last CC or a recent ProActive video, NP mentioned the UK, Canada and the US, and in the same breath said something about the Philippines. I saw people taking about the Philippines on Yahoo today and thought they were going too far, but seeing the article posted to CytoDyn.com makes me wonder. I hope they have filed or will promptly file for a M2M EUA in the Philippines and not wait around for the S2C results. I recall NP saying something about the Philippines having difficulty getting medications into their country. This would be a good way for both the Philippines and CytoDyn to come out winners. This is clearly not a zero sum game for the two of them.