So you're alias seems a bit new, but I kinda wonde
Post# of 153887
(Total Views: 817)
Posted On: 11/23/2020 9:45:25 PM
So you're alias seems a bit new, but I kinda wonder if the FDA drove the wedge between NP and Dr. Bruce. (keep in mind this is absolute and complete speculation but plausible). Last year around January or November 2018ish everyone was thrilled that cydy hired a scientist named Dr. Richard Pestell to be our CMO. He brought his "wonderful" prostrate cancer test with his company and was going to kick start CYDY's cancer because he showed us how good it was in cancer. Fast forward a few months, no one wanted Dr. Pestells cancer test, we were lied to that it was further along than it was, and Dr. Pestell appeared to go behind NP's back and talk with other pharmas.
Now again we have Dr. BP swoop in, show us where Dr. Pestell had it wrong so we could find actual candidates for our cancer trials. Then helped show us the pathway to covid. everything was fine and dandy like cotton candy and Dr. BP even set up an agreement to use old leronlimab on his assay tests. The cydy/incelldx honeymoon was on. Except along comes the BLA and the FDA shoots down the Receptor occupancy tests.
I think in NP's mind he was living the Pestell situation all over again, another scientist that comes into save the day only to have the product he sold us on get rejected. In Dr. BP's words he has had no problem with other pharmas using his kits...only CYDY's so I think NP is just distancing himself like he did with Pestell...but I think the Dr. Bruce situation may be more FDA garbage vs the deceit by Pestell.
I don't really blame NP for the fool me once, fool me twice feeling. This time he moved much quicker to break the relationship. Pestell cost us millions, whereas I think Dr. BP's help was way more beneficial. I wish incelldx luck in their endeavors and the same for CYDY. Should they cross paths again, I wouldn't be opposed.
Now again we have Dr. BP swoop in, show us where Dr. Pestell had it wrong so we could find actual candidates for our cancer trials. Then helped show us the pathway to covid. everything was fine and dandy like cotton candy and Dr. BP even set up an agreement to use old leronlimab on his assay tests. The cydy/incelldx honeymoon was on. Except along comes the BLA and the FDA shoots down the Receptor occupancy tests.
I think in NP's mind he was living the Pestell situation all over again, another scientist that comes into save the day only to have the product he sold us on get rejected. In Dr. BP's words he has had no problem with other pharmas using his kits...only CYDY's so I think NP is just distancing himself like he did with Pestell...but I think the Dr. Bruce situation may be more FDA garbage vs the deceit by Pestell.
I don't really blame NP for the fool me once, fool me twice feeling. This time he moved much quicker to break the relationship. Pestell cost us millions, whereas I think Dr. BP's help was way more beneficial. I wish incelldx luck in their endeavors and the same for CYDY. Should they cross paths again, I wouldn't be opposed.
(10)
(0)