I didn't have time to respond to this yesterday, b
Post# of 36536
Additionally, Moscato reports, "The in vivo testing currently in progress is turning out to be much, much better than we anticipated."
My understanding would be this: There is no animal testing required, as Joe told us many times. So a statement that in vivo testing is in progress would mean that at least one test was filled with human subjects, and a vaccine was given.
Help me out with what can be read from the last part of the statement that this testing "is turning out to be much, much better than we anticipated." What can we infer about the stage of the testing and data analysis from this?
I don't have a deep understanding of the details of testing. But this statement seems HUGE to me, yet the muted response on the board has me thinking maybe I am misunderstanding some aspect of this.
Thanks for any educated light anyone can shine on this!