While investigators initially didn't see a statist
Post# of 148163
Quote:
While investigators initially didn't see a statistically significant death-risk reduction in the overall study group, a post hoc analysis found one group in which the benefit was clear. For patients who received low-flow oxygen, investigators recorded 70% fewer deaths for remdesivir patients compared with those on placebo. That group of patients made up 40% of the overall study.
Really ??? So, it helped 40% of the patients with 70% reduction on deaths and:
Quote:
But while remdesivir is "indeed helpful in shortening the duration of disease, reducing the progression to more complicated disease, and probably (but not definitively), saving lives," the "fine print … is perhaps less encouraging than the top line," SVB Leerink analyst Geoffrey Porges wrote in a note to clients.
The drug didn't conclusively improve survival at Day 29, "which is the endpoint of most importance in the end," he noted.
And then it is tried across the world in 405 hospitals in 30 countries 11,266 adults were randomized, with 2750 allocated Remdesivir and ...
Guess what ????
Quote:
No study drug definitely reduced mortality (in unventilated patients or any other subgroup of entry characteristics), initiation of ventilation or hospitalisation duration.
No benefit.
I am not telling you who do I believe .....