Good morning. I have considered your statement.
Post# of 82672
The way that I see it, in my opinion, is as follows. There are three scenarios:
1. Since March, the Company has created value for shareholders that can offset the large paper losses.
2. One is not willing to have paid 99% of their investment toward salaries and other company expenses since March that has led to these paper losses.
3. One believes paying a 99% paper loss is fair for the company’s current and future prospects and for sharing in the Company’s vision. There are no corporate “do-overs.”
As far as eating, one should not have to break the law to eat and should find a solution that does not harm someone else in this situation.