I seem to hear two competing notions for why DSMC
Post# of 154899
(Total Views: 732)
Posted On: 10/25/2020 12:21:42 AM
I seem to hear two competing notions for why DSMC would ask for the 75% review:
1. Things are looking really good. I think you can prove enough at 75% that we would recommend stopping for efficacy.
2. Things are borderline. We want to look again at 75% to give you some new advice (stop, add patients, keep going to the end).
I don't have a good sense of which it is. I'm pretty sure that Ohm thinks it is #1, and I have faith in his opinion. But, I'm still not sure.
blafarm: Do you have an opinion if it is #1 or #2 above? Or #3?
Some have said that "DSMC works for us (CYDY)." So, "we" know what is true. As I have suggested multiple times today....If you think #1 is true, you should unblind now.
If you think #2 is true, you should not unblind.
CYDY "might" have the inside scoop. They are not planning to unblind. I am fearful.
How is that for a way to start your Monday morning? Fortunately, you have no real reason to put any stock in my suppositions!
1. Things are looking really good. I think you can prove enough at 75% that we would recommend stopping for efficacy.
2. Things are borderline. We want to look again at 75% to give you some new advice (stop, add patients, keep going to the end).
I don't have a good sense of which it is. I'm pretty sure that Ohm thinks it is #1, and I have faith in his opinion. But, I'm still not sure.
blafarm: Do you have an opinion if it is #1 or #2 above? Or #3?
Some have said that "DSMC works for us (CYDY)." So, "we" know what is true. As I have suggested multiple times today....If you think #1 is true, you should unblind now.
If you think #2 is true, you should not unblind.
CYDY "might" have the inside scoop. They are not planning to unblind. I am fearful.
How is that for a way to start your Monday morning? Fortunately, you have no real reason to put any stock in my suppositions!
(0)
(0)