I'd say that was a pretty bad breakdown of the trial.
"It seems that the lawyers really don't care about this case. From what I remember (please correct me if I am wrong), but they are getting paid on a contingency basis. They are getting paid a percentage of the winnings."
QMC is not getting any "winnings" from this trial,they were defending themselves.They paid a day early and a day late and the lenders are seeking "damages" for that.QMC s defense is that the lenders are trying to charge "penalties " for early payment and late payment ( due to banks being closed on the dates due ).Penalties are illegal in Kansas and that was just one part of Minns defence arguments.You got your trials completely mixed up with the K & L lawsuit as well.
"It seems that the lawyers really don't care about this case. From what I remember (please correct me if I am wrong), but they are getting paid on a contingency basis. They are getting paid a percentage of the winnings."
QMC is not getting any "winnings" from this trial,they were defending themselves.They paid a day early and a day late and the lenders are seeking "damages" for that.QMC s defense is that the lenders are trying to charge "penalties " for early payment and late payment ( due to banks being closed on the dates due ).Penalties are illegal in Kansas and that was just one part of Minns defence arguments.You got your trials completely mixed up with the K & L lawsuit as well.
