Based on replies, I'll ask these questions...did I

Based on replies, I'll ask these questions...did Intel tell shareholders/public specifics about their penta series of chips, then later the quad core chips? Nope - just that they were working on faster, more powerful chips for processing graphics or data (and most even had code names, so you KNOW they were trying to keep the project under wraps). In fact, can anybody name ANY tech company that gave specifics about their intermediate successes (or failures) before rolling out the usage for their underlying product - I can't think of a single one that has done that until that roll out is fully public (think Apple under Jobs and the Iphone, think Microsoft rollouts with Gates talking about Windows, etc).

Same with GNBT, which is also a new technology - it is NOT required that Joe or GNBT update the world on the interim specifics of what they are doing, even if they have chosen to update on the general areas they are working on. And as far as we know, the agreements with Malaysia or China may require a level of quiet about the interim results. As I said in my first post, just the fact that they have those deals that involve actual payments to GNBT speaks volumes about what they have, without spelling it out for the world.

As many here have said, even updating their findings would only likely result in a minor increase in pps, and that would likely be temporary. Hold off until your tech allows the development of a full vaccine that is going into testing and then impact can be huge.

But the initial reason I responded was about why the pps wasn't moving and if it is related to GNBT's history. You now know my thoughts, so there isn't much more I can add.