Many have stated the run up in 2013 and 2014 was

Quote:

---

Many have stated the run up in 2013 and 2014 was also instigated by the same manipulators in order to profit from the peak $5.00 a share stock price by selling the stock short for the long trip down.

Do you think that was likely?.

---

yes

Quote:

---

If that is the case what is to keep the same manipulators from pushing the stock up again if it receives good results from the human trials?

---

because NR can only *reset* so many times when a company executes .. NRs' elastic band on IPIX (fka CTIX) has been stretched too many times without achieving end result of *sells* (just one reason why it's worth tracking DRS %s over time because it almost always show an increase upward % wise)

also understand .. *imo* the way it works for NR is they work cycles on an OTC target (PPS taken up/PPS taken down) .. until something affects that effort .. *imo* LE's comments about uplisting in the last half of 2014 (think it was September 2014 but don't hold me to that exact month) was the signal for the hand off which imo kicked off in January 2015 .. and that is why it was so revealing (again imo) to see what *efforts* NR had to undertake by August 2015

and for the most part *imo* NRs' efforts did not work re: Innovation Pharma investors

what separates an OTC survivor *imo* are investors (not talking traders who provide liquidity or other NR entities who imo will collude as needed for various reasons)

investors who not only don't get shaken out regardless of PPS *compression*
but continue to add to their overall holdings .. month in/month out .. year in/year out

this to me was very evident in the first 8 months of 2018 (total lack of volume) .. and as noted previously .. confirmed with September 2019's AGM %s .. in spite of what I'd noted contemporaneously in the last few months of 2018 .. (NRs' bogus volume injection done in alignment with NRs' trolls yammering on about EOY tax loss selling)

Quote:

---

Obviously if Brilacidin becomes a Covid19 drug the share price will go up, but I mean manipulate it upwards beyond all reason. Again I realize their ability to manipulate stocks with higher share prices on different exchanges is limited and requires much more capital.

It just seems logical they could settle their shorts in the 20 cent range and go long.

---

because this isn't legal shorting .. it's abusive and done via colluding entities (specific in this case to the OTC) where *outcomes* can almost always be controlled (99%)

this is why i note my volume expectations with news .. because what NR has an issue with re: IPIX in 2020 (forget from 2014 onward) is an outcome they literally CANT control due to C-19 upending *imo* their planned efforts for the stock in 2020

i have no doubts sans B & C-19 potential .. IPIX would have seen their 52 week low *reset* yet again in 2020

so my expectation .. with news that NR CANT control .. is not only volume but NR being forced to work a cycle (PPS) significantly upward ..

as we all saw in May 2019 when *imo* NR *negated* the AS news (from memory so I may be off .. 8k'd in July 2019) .. IPIX had 23M in *volume* for the month and again from memory so I may be off .. NR *worked* IPIX to (approx) 44c before *resetting* .. back then (seems quaint now) .. *volume* records on IPIX (2014 - 2019) were a handful of days @ 4M~ per

i'd noted (may be in the post stickied above) that 70c is a key metric *imo* for NR re: IPIX/CTIX

lastly when I reference NR being between a rock and a hard place .. it is because
what i'm watching for is when NR works volume above (90 day vol avg) of (approx) NOW 3M~ because the days i've been able to watch *trading* (for the whole day) .. they are literally struggling to both *hold* a tight PPS range and not *inject* volume (prior injections imo have caught up to them in conjunction with unknown factors re: B & C-19)

IPIX volume avgs after Friday's *volume* & news

IPIX ..
Volume (10 day Average) 1,581,720
Volume (90 day Average) 2,976,062

this may sound contrary .. but every time NR has to reset a reset (clock) for another CE (colluding entity) it's a stress added to years of stress already in place

my expectation is if LE does a sequence of news that NR CANT reset back .. NR will have to go after every GTC listed for sale on IPIX .. and even that may only be a dent in what has to be made whole .. that is why my expectation is not only *volume* but significant PPS *appreciation* (NRs' cycle UP) on IPIX

i only mention OSTK/OSTKO .. because like a few other Innovation Pharma investors .. i've been invested there for years .. (not OTC) .. also tracking *volume* and PPS brutalization for years .. it all blew up in NRs' face earlier this year .. note the PPS range on both ..

Detailed Quote:OSTK
OVERSTOCK.COM INC
77.93Down -5.94 (-7.0824 %)AS OF 4:00:00PM ET 10/02/2020

52-Week High
08/19/2020 128.50
52-Week Low
03/18/2020 2.53

Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
10/02/2020 +652.22%

Volume 7,240,668
Volume (10 day Average) 5,783,694
Volume (90 day Average) 6,109,223

Market Capitalization $3.31B
Shares Outstanding 42,480,000

Detailed Quote:OSTKO
OVERSTOCK.COM INC
65.125Down -3.865 (-5.602261 %)AS OF 3:46:34PM ET 10/02/2020

52-Week High
08/20/2020 99.99
52-Week Low
05/20/2020 3.50

Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
10/02/2020 --% (won't show until trading for 1 year)

Volume 8,038
Volume (10 day Average) 6,084
Volume (90 day Average) 24,356

Market Capitalization $8.92M
Shares Outstanding 137,000


hope this helps .. as a rule i try to not discuss abusive vs legal
because NRs' trolls try to conflate the two .. please realize very few
OTC targets .. outlast let alone survive NRs' efforts .. when it happens
*imo* it's due to .. targeted companies' ability to execute .. investors .. and the
fact that when a targets' PPS has been brutalized for years .. NRs' abusive efforts
can become the largest *asset* in the mix

4kids

Quote:

---

Many thanks for your many thoughtful posts. Quick question

Many have stated the run up in 2013 and 2014 was also instigated by the same manipulators in order to profit from the peak $5.00 a share stock price by selling the stock short for the long trip down.

Do you think that was likely?.

If that is the case what is to keep the same manipulators from pushing the stock up again if it receives good results from the human trials?

Obviously if Brilacidin becomes a Covid19 drug the share price will go up, but I mean manipulate it upwards beyond all reason. Again I realize their ability to manipulate stocks with higher share prices on different exchanges is limited and requires much more capital.

It just seems logical they could settle their shorts in the 20 cent range and go long.

TIA Farrell

---