Yes something about needing more of a signal in ca
Post# of 155038
(Total Views: 581)
Posted On: 09/14/2020 4:54:59 PM
Yes something about needing more of a signal in cancer. I admit, I have no idea what that means. Maybe the CTC drop is good lab results, but it's not passing the eye test for patients experiencing what NPs mother in law experienced as far as feeling better. From what I remember (and anyone can feel free to correct me if I'm misremembering). We did do a NASH animal trial in November with good results although I don't know that the good results numbers were released, however it was not an apples to apples comparison of the last company that got a big pharma license payday. There was a PR June 11 that we initiated a phase 2 90 patient double blind placebo trial. Might be worth asking on wed conference call where that is at. The initial animal results for gvhd were phenomenal I believe every single mouse survived. You can't get better than 100%. Humans still are a different breed(well most are...some rats do exist amongst the homosapiens) though so I await trial findings. I believe we did inject the first human in March or there abouts.
These have been quite silent. Would be nice to hear about them since they are large markets as well although perhaps NP feels cancer is further along maybe he has more affinity for that one due to what his mother in law was going through.(** Note I have no idea what goes on inside his head so the last sentence is absolute speculation/thinking out loud)
These have been quite silent. Would be nice to hear about them since they are large markets as well although perhaps NP feels cancer is further along maybe he has more affinity for that one due to what his mother in law was going through.(** Note I have no idea what goes on inside his head so the last sentence is absolute speculation/thinking out loud)
(1)
(0)