You keep looking in the wrong place for the wrong
Post# of 7795
(Total Views: 236)
Posted On: 09/09/2020 6:41:23 AM
You keep looking in the wrong place for the wrong thing.
Bluefin doesn't have a non-ferrous sensor listed as an option, right?
So why do you think GMAR got the sensor from Bluefin? The photo I linked from Bluefin shows there is room to integrate sensors. Do you think Bluefin makes every sensor available?
The non ferrous sensor may have been available years ago when it was purchased, but is not available now.
Folks buy AUV's (UUV's) for different reasons depending on what field they are in.
A company in oil and gas may use sub bottom profiling to inspect buried lines, and they wouldn't want a non ferrous sensor.
SFRX got the back ordered 3rd party sensor for Tinkerbell 2.0 at the end of Q1 2020, right?
They are trying to get their software to interpret the date from the sensor to differentiate the various metals, but they seem to be having trouble.
It happens with modifications.
Now take a breather and think about what you ask ahead of time. These assumptions you're making aren't helpful.
The peel grab in it's original form was not designed for shipwreck salvage 13,000 feet deep. If you went to the peel grab website for information on shipwreck salvage it likely isn't there.
Real salvors do mods. They adapt. How many years have I been posting that? SFRX is finally attempting to do the same thing. They claim Torres lied about have the technology to do EXACTLY why they claim they now can do.
Where did they get such technology?
They didn't. They simply are attempting to improve on existing technology. They haven't even claimed it was proprietary, but now we have a poster making that claim.
What Endurance has been doing the last few years is not available on Bluefin's website. But if I were a novice I might think it would be.
Perhaps if you had been as demanding of SFRX when they missed the 30-90 day claim made in July 2019, you might not be so frustrated.
Bluefin doesn't have a non-ferrous sensor listed as an option, right?
So why do you think GMAR got the sensor from Bluefin? The photo I linked from Bluefin shows there is room to integrate sensors. Do you think Bluefin makes every sensor available?
The non ferrous sensor may have been available years ago when it was purchased, but is not available now.
Folks buy AUV's (UUV's) for different reasons depending on what field they are in.
A company in oil and gas may use sub bottom profiling to inspect buried lines, and they wouldn't want a non ferrous sensor.
SFRX got the back ordered 3rd party sensor for Tinkerbell 2.0 at the end of Q1 2020, right?
They are trying to get their software to interpret the date from the sensor to differentiate the various metals, but they seem to be having trouble.
It happens with modifications.
Now take a breather and think about what you ask ahead of time. These assumptions you're making aren't helpful.
The peel grab in it's original form was not designed for shipwreck salvage 13,000 feet deep. If you went to the peel grab website for information on shipwreck salvage it likely isn't there.
Real salvors do mods. They adapt. How many years have I been posting that? SFRX is finally attempting to do the same thing. They claim Torres lied about have the technology to do EXACTLY why they claim they now can do.
Where did they get such technology?
They didn't. They simply are attempting to improve on existing technology. They haven't even claimed it was proprietary, but now we have a poster making that claim.
What Endurance has been doing the last few years is not available on Bluefin's website. But if I were a novice I might think it would be.
Perhaps if you had been as demanding of SFRX when they missed the 30-90 day claim made in July 2019, you might not be so frustrated.
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼